Log in
E-mail
Password
Show password
Remember
Forgot password ?
Become a member for free
Sign up
Sign up
New member
Sign up for FREE
New customer
Discover our services
Settings
Settings
Dynamic quotes 
OFFON
  1. Homepage
  2. Equities
  3. Netherlands
  4. Euronext Amsterdam
  5. Shell plc
  6. News
  7. Summary
    RDSA   GB00B03MLX29

SHELL PLC

(RDSA)
  Report
SummaryQuotesChartsNewsRatingsCalendarCompanyFinancialsConsensusRevisions 
SummaryMost relevantAll NewsAnalyst Reco.Other languagesPress ReleasesOfficial PublicationsSector newsMarketScreener Strategies

Shell Judgment a Blow for Activists

12/04/2021 | 10:06am EST

The oil company will proceed with its search for oil and gas off South Africa'sWild Coast after environmental groups failed to convince a judge of the severity of its impact on marine life.

Shell can proceed with its seismic survey to explore for oil and gas off South Africa's environmentally sensitive Wild Coast.

This is the upshot of acting Judge Avinash Govindjee's ruling in the high court in Makhanda on Friday 3 December. He dismissed the urgent application by four environmental and human rights organisations for an interdict to stop the survey ahead of a planned judicial review of the government's decision to grant the company exploration rights.

In essence, the judge ruled, their submissions about the detrimental impact of the survey on the environment and marine life were "speculative at best".

"I accept that the applicants are of the firm view that the survey will cause irreparable harm. But objectively speaking, a reasonable apprehension of irreparable harm [if the interdict is not granted ahead of the review] has not been established."

The judge said that even the applicants' expert - on a promise of further testimony "in due course" - only went so far as to label Shell's assertion that the survey would have no environmental impact on the area as "misleading".

He said the applicants had also not shown that the mitigation programme Shell outlined was inadequate or that the oil company would not adhere to the mitigation measures, as it was obliged to do by law.

Buffer zones

The Border Deep Sea Angling Association, Kei Mouth Ski Boat Club, community and environmental law non-profit Natural Justice and Greenpeace Africa claimed Shell did not obtain the necessary environmental authorisation. They alleged that the government did not inform interested and affected parties or the public about granting the exploration right or two applications to renew the company's right to explore off the Wild Coast.

Shell said the application had been brought with undue haste after it had already invested millions of dollars to gain approval and planning for the survey.

It claimed that seismic surveys are "standard practice" in South Africa and around the world, and that there is little chance of harm to marine life when proper mitigation processes are applied. Shell added that it would apply a 5km buffer zone around protected marine areas along the Wild Coast, even though the law only requires a 2km zone.

It said there would be 24-hour acoustic monitoring and that independent marine mammal observers would conduct visual inspections.

Govindjee said there was no evidence before him to show that Shell would not comply with its obligations. "Weighing financial consequences against environmental harm is an invidious task," he said.

While the Constitution promises protection of the environment, the government granted Shell these exploration rights a number of years ago and has renewed them.

Govindjee said the applicants failed to convince him that there was a well-reasoned apprehension of irreparable harm if the interdict was not granted.

He did, however, comment on the prospects of the review application. He expressed doubt as to whether the applicants would succeed in getting the government's approval of the 2014 exploration right or its first renewal set aside, because of the passage of time and as the issue is now moot.

Their challenge against the most recent renewal of the exploration licence "holds the best prospects of success", he said. This is because though Shell notified interested and affected parties, there was a seeming lack of "genuine" consultation and an audit, required by law, had not been done by an independent body.

New interdict application

The environmental groups said they were dismayed by the ruling but would support the Wild Coast communities that applied for a new interdict on Thursday 2 December, allegedly on the grounds that Shell does not have the proper environmental authorisation for the survey and that small-scale fishing communities were not consulted.

They are also considering appealing parts of Govindjee's ruling.

"The application had to be made on a hyper-urgent basis [as a result of Shell's actions and the inaction of Minister of Mineral Resources and Energy Gwede Mantashe], which meant that it had not been possible for experts to finalise detailed reports and affidavits by the time the application was launched," said the groups.

Greenpeace Africa will continue to support the nationwide resistance to this exploration project through legal avenues, said senior climate and energy campaign manager Happy Khambule.

"The outcome is very unfortunate," said Natural Justice executive director Pooven Moodley, "especially since the judge did not recognise the urgency of the interdict and the immediate threat the seismic surveys pose to the environment, marine life and local communities. We will continue to fight them on the beaches and in court."

John Luef from the Border Deep Sea Angling Association said: "We are extremely disappointed with the outcome of this hearing. This is not the end. We will continue to fight for our local people, their heritage and the environment."

Shell said it would proceed with the seismic survey in line with its approvals and permits.

The company has been served with the fresh interdict application, but the court has yet to schedule the hearing.

Copyright New Frame. Distributed by AllAfrica Global Media (allAfrica.com)., source News Service English

All news about SHELL PLC
01/25Shell to Halt Dutch Refinery Operations For Maintenance
MT
01/25Energy Stocks Mixed Pre-Bell Tuesday
MT
01/25Vertex Energy, Clean Harbors Agree to Terminate Planned Acquisition of Vertex's Used Mo..
MT
01/25Shell Said to Make 'Significant' Oil and Gas Discovery Offshore Namibia
MT
01/25Shell Makes Significant Offshore Oil, Gas Discovery In Namibia
MT
01/25Royal Dutch Shell plc will Change its Name to Shell plc
CI
01/24Royal Dutch Shell plc changes its name to Shell plc
AQ
01/23Shell Formally Drops Royal Dutch from Name in Restructuring Move
MT
01/21Royal Dutch no more - Shell officially changes name
RE
01/21Royal dutch shell plc changes its name to shell plc as part of p…
RE
More news
Analyst Recommendations on SHELL PLC
More recommendations
Financials (USD)
Sales 2021 251 B - -
Net income 2021 15 261 M - -
Net Debt 2021 49 880 M - -
P/E ratio 2021 11,5x
Yield 2021 3,66%
Capitalization 186 B 186 B -
EV / Sales 2021 0,94x
EV / Sales 2022 0,80x
Nbr of Employees 87 000
Free-Float 98,6%
Chart SHELL PLC
Duration : Period :
Shell plc Technical Analysis Chart | RDSA | GB00B03MLX29 | MarketScreener
Technical analysis trends SHELL PLC
Short TermMid-TermLong Term
TrendsBullishBullishBullish
Income Statement Evolution
Consensus
Sell
Buy
Mean consensus BUY
Number of Analysts 13
Last Close Price 24,45 $
Average target price 28,28 $
Spread / Average Target 15,6%
EPS Revisions
Managers and Directors
Bernardus Cornelis Adriana Margriet van Beurden Chief Executive Officer & Executive Director
Jessica Rodgers Uhl Chief Financial Officer & Director
Andrew Stewart Mackenzie Chairman
Harry Brekelmans Director-Technology & Projects
Gerrit Zalm Independent Non-Executive Director
Sector and Competitors
1st jan.Capi. (M$)
SHELL PLC12.04%186 097
SAUDI ARABIAN OIL COMPANY2.23%1 950 284
TOTALENERGIES SE10.03%144 398
PETROCHINA COMPANY LIMITED11.53%142 049
EQUINOR ASA5.89%89 874
PUBLIC JOINT STOCK COMPANY GAZPROM-14.26%87 958