Log in
E-mail
Password
Show password
Remember
Forgot password ?
Become a member for free
Sign up
Sign up
New member
Sign up for FREE
New customer
Discover our services
Settings
Settings
Dynamic quotes 
OFFON

PERRIGO COMPANY PLC

(PRGO)
  Report
SummaryQuotesChartsNewsRatingsCalendarCompanyFinancialsConsensusRevisions 
SummaryMost relevantAll NewsAnalyst Reco.Other languagesPress ReleasesOfficial PublicationsSector newsMarketScreener Strategies

Economic Substance Doctrine: Still Giving Perrigo Heartburn?

09/20/2021 | 10:10pm EDT

Tax practitioners frequently struggle when providing advice on some cases in areas of tax law that have limited statutory guidance and a sizable body of case law. The reason is that the case law is often internally inconsistent; the courts can generate obfuscating noise. Sometimes the signal in the accumulated case law is relatively faint. For those studying hundreds of cases, the noisiness of a complex web of interacting considerations makes it difficult to assess the importance of any given factor in a case. Fortunately, advances in computing power and machine learning offer an opportunity to amplify the signal and diminish the noise to better understand the law.

In last month's inaugural installment of Blue J Predicts, we examined whether an appeal of a Tax Court decision to the D.C. Circuit would be dismissed on the issue of whether a partnership exists.1 This month's installment evaluates the strength of the commissioner's economic substance arguments in the pending Perrigo2 case, which was heard before the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan in a nine-day bench trial that concluded on June 7. Post-trial submissions have not yet been filed by the parties, and proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law were unavailable at the time of writing.

Although there are multiple issues at play in Perrigo, here we focus primarily on the economic substance arguments advanced by the government and the taxpayer. In addition to defending its transactions as having economic substance, the taxpayer takes the position that the application of the economic substance and sham doctrines is improper in the circumstances, and the court should focus solely on remedying any alleged deficiencies through section 482 transfer pricing mechanisms designed to deal with disputes of this nature. Although it remains to be seen whether the court will bypass what would otherwise be a significant issue in cases like this one, any discussion of the issue by the court will necessitate some commentary on the nature of the transactions and whether they meet some de minimis threshold to overcome the government's sham doctrine and economic substance attacks.

Unlike an appeal decision, parties before a court of first instance do not have the benefit of presumed findings of fact or conclusions of law. Instead, parties must contend with the uncertainties regarding sufficiency of evidence and vastly different characterizations of material facts. This makes understanding the legal significance of each factor more important and allows tax practitioners to focus their arguments on characterizations likely to matter most to courts.

Based on only the information available leading up to trial and without regard to the sufficiency of evidence, Blue J's algorithm predicts with 68 percent confidence that a court will find that the transactions in question will survive an economic substance challenge. This prediction does not, however, speak to the extent to which the taxpayer's income may be subject to recharacterization under section 482 transfer pricing rules. The economic substance issue could go either way, especially since the merits of the case turn on disputed material findings of fact and conclusions of law that are unavailable.

READ FULL ARTICLE ON TAXNOTES

Footnotes

1 Benjamin Alarie, Bettina Xue Griffin, and Christopher Yan, "An Unprofitable Pretax Venture Can Still Be a Partnership," Tax Notes Federal, June 21, 2021, p. 1951.

2 Perrigo Co. v. United States, No. 1:17-cv-00737 (W.D. Mich. 2021).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mr Benjamin Alarie
Blue J Legal
325 Front St W
Toronto
M5V 2Y1
CANADA
E-mail: tessa.barclay@bluejlegal.com
URL: www.bluej.com/

© Mondaq Ltd, 2021 - Tel. +44 (0)20 8544 8300 - http://www.mondaq.com, source Business Briefing

All news about PERRIGO COMPANY PLC
10/14PERRIGO : Raymond James Upgrades Perrigo to Outperform from Market Perform, Sets $59 Price..
MT
10/08PERRIGO CO PLC : Change in Directors or Principal Officers, Other Events (form 8-K)
AQ
10/05PERRIGO : Names New President of Consumer Self-Care Americas Unit
MT
10/05PERRIGO : Announces New Consumer Self-Care Americas (CSCA) Leadership
PR
10/05Perrigo Company plc Announces Appointment of Jim Dillard as EVP and President, Consumer..
CI
09/30Health Care Down, But Not By Much, As Deal Activity Cushions Losses - Health Care Round..
DJ
09/30Perrigo, Virgin Galactic rise; CarMax, Devon Energy fall
AQ
09/30Health Care Stocks Closing Slightly Lower After Early Gains
MT
09/30Health Care Stocks Unable to Sustain Early Rise
MT
09/30WALL STREET STOCK EXCHANGE : Markets take a breather after the purge
More news
Analyst Recommendations on PERRIGO COMPANY PLC
More recommendations
Financials (USD)
Sales 2021 4 173 M - -
Net income 2021 - - -
Net Debt 2021 1 829 M - -
P/E ratio 2021 -41,6x
Yield 2021 2,19%
Capitalization 6 119 M 6 119 M -
EV / Sales 2021 1,90x
EV / Sales 2022 2,19x
Nbr of Employees 11 500
Free-Float 98,8%
Chart PERRIGO COMPANY PLC
Duration : Period :
Perrigo Company plc Technical Analysis Chart | PRGO | IE00BGH1M568 | MarketScreener
Technical analysis trends PERRIGO COMPANY PLC
Short TermMid-TermLong Term
TrendsNeutralNeutralNeutral
Income Statement Evolution
Consensus
Sell
Buy
Mean consensus OUTPERFORM
Number of Analysts 5
Last Close Price 45,76 $
Average target price 57,50 $
Spread / Average Target 25,7%
EPS Revisions
Managers and Directors
Murray S. Kessler President, Chief Executive Officer & Director
Raymond P. Silcock CFO, Principal Accounting Officer & Executive VP
Rolf Allan Classon Chairman
Thomas M. Farrington Chief Information Officer & Executive VP
Grainne Quinn Chief Medical Officer & Executive Vice President
Sector and Competitors
1st jan.Capi. (M$)
PERRIGO COMPANY PLC2.33%6 119
JOHNSON & JOHNSON4.07%431 148
ROCHE HOLDING AG13.98%333 101
PFIZER, INC.14.34%239 966
NOVO NORDISK A/S56.26%238 738
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY44.35%220 952