Log in
E-mail
Password
Show password
Remember
Forgot password ?
Become a member for free
Sign up
Sign up
New member
Sign up for FREE
New customer
Discover our services
Settings
Settings
Dynamic quotes 
OFFON

FORD MOTOR COMPANY

(F)
  Report
SummaryQuotesChartsNewsRatingsCalendarCompanyFinancialsConsensusRevisions 
SummaryMost relevantAll NewsAnalyst Reco.Other languagesPress ReleasesOfficial PublicationsSector newsMarketScreener Strategies

The Plot Thickens. New York Court Of Appeals Finds Companies Do NOT Consent To Jurisdiction By Registering To Do Business There.

11/29/2021 | 03:11am EST

In a post on October 10, 2021, I shared my thoughts on the Georgia Supreme Court's recent decision holding that a company that registers to do business in Georgia has ipso facto consented to the general jurisdiction of Georgia courts over lawsuits brought there. I explained this was the minority rule. The New York Court of Appeals recently added clarity to the majority position by holding that companies do NOT consent to general jurisdiction simply because they have registered to do business and have an agent for service of process in the Empire State.

Both the Georgia and New York cases involved very similar product liability claims arising out of auto accidents. In the New York case, Aybar v. Aybar, plaintiffs sued Ford Motor Company, The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., and José Aybar for injuries when the vehicle they were passengers in overturned in the State of Virginia. Neither Ford nor Goodyear were incorporated in New York and did not maintain their principal places of business in New York. However, pursuant to the New York Business Corporation Law, to do business in New York foreign corporations must register with the New York Secretary of State and designate an in-state agent for service. As such, plaintiffs attempted to gain personal jurisdiction over Ford and Goodyear in New York by personally serving those entities' designated agents for service.

Ford and Goodyear moved to dismiss and asserted that personal service on their agents in New York did not confer general jurisdiction over them. The trial court disagreed and declined to dismiss plaintiffs' claims on the basis that it lacked personal jurisdiction over these entities. The Appellate Division reversed, holding that general jurisdiction could not be exercised over a foreign corporation on the sole basis that the foreign corporation's designated agent for service was personally served in New York. Plaintiffs appealed to the New York Court of Appeals, New York's highest court, and it affirmed. 

I will keep an eye on the decisions on this topic in future posts. It is only a matter of time before SCOTUS weighs in and hopefully resolves the current split in authority. As I said in my October 10 post, I'm hoping that day is sooner, rather than later.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mr Paul E. Benson
Michael Best & Friedrich
100 East Wisconsin Avenue
Suite 3300
Milwaukee
WI 53202 4108
UNITED STATES

© Mondaq Ltd, 2021 - Tel. +44 (0)20 8544 8300 - http://www.mondaq.com, source Business Briefing

Stocks mentioned in the article
ChangeLast1st jan.
FORD MOTOR COMPANY -4.62% 20.65 Delayed Quote.4.24%
THE GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY -1.06% 21.51 Delayed Quote.1.97%
All news about FORD MOTOR COMPANY
01/21S&P 500 Posts 5.7% Weekly Drop as Consumer Discretionary, Communication Services, Techn..
MT
01/21GM to spend $6.5B, add 4,000 jobs at Michigan EV factories
AQ
01/21NORTH AMERICAN MORNING BRIEFING : Dow Wobbles, -3-
DJ
01/20GM to deliver electric SUV Cadillac Lyriq to customers in 'few months'
RE
01/20WALL STREET STOCK EXCHANGE : Nasdaq aims for rebound after entering correction territory
01/20Wall Street Set for Gains; Jobless Claims Jump to 286,000
MT
01/20ANALYST RECOMMENDATIONS : Activision Blizzard, AMD, Bumble, Etsy, Ford...
01/20Jefferies Downgrades Ford Motor to Hold From Buy; Price Target is $25
MT
01/19Ford, US Bancorp fall; Bank of America, Tegna rise
AQ
01/19Consumer Discretionary Stocks Losing More Ground Ahead of Wednesday Close
MT
More news
Analyst Recommendations on FORD MOTOR COMPANY
More recommendations
Financials (USD)
Sales 2021 127 B - -
Net income 2021 6 586 M - -
Net cash 2021 5 618 M - -
P/E ratio 2021 12,3x
Yield 2021 0,48%
Capitalization 82 522 M 82 522 M -
EV / Sales 2021 0,61x
EV / Sales 2022 0,49x
Nbr of Employees 186 000
Free-Float -
Chart FORD MOTOR COMPANY
Duration : Period :
Ford Motor Company Technical Analysis Chart | F | US3453708600 | MarketScreener
Technical analysis trends FORD MOTOR COMPANY
Short TermMid-TermLong Term
TrendsNeutralBullishBullish
Income Statement Evolution
Consensus
Sell
Buy
Mean consensus OUTPERFORM
Number of Analysts 22
Last Close Price 20,65 $
Average target price 22,04 $
Spread / Average Target 6,72%
EPS Revisions
Managers and Directors
James D. Farley President, Chief Executive Officer & Director
John T. Lawler CFO-Ford Asia Pacific & Africa
William Clay Ford VP & Head-Commercial Truck Vehicle Center
Douglas Field Chief Advanced Technology Officer
Michael R. Amend Chief Digital & Information Officer
Sector and Competitors
1st jan.Capi. (M$)
FORD MOTOR COMPANY4.24%82 522
TOYOTA MOTOR CORPORATION8.50%277 446
VOLKSWAGEN AG5.71%130 696
DAIMLER AG6.42%87 278
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY-9.13%77 355
BAYERISCHE MOTOREN WERKE AG7.99%70 434