Log in
E-mail
Password
Show password
Remember
Forgot password ?
Become a member for free
Sign up
Sign up
New member
Sign up for FREE
New customer
Discover our services
Settings
Settings
Dynamic quotes 
OFFON

CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

(CHTR)
  Report
SummaryQuotesChartsNewsRatingsCalendarCompanyFinancialsConsensusRevisions 
SummaryMost relevantAll NewsAnalyst Reco.Other languagesPress ReleasesOfficial PublicationsSector newsMarketScreener Strategies

Charter Communications : TCPA Litigation Update — Sixth Circuit Holds TCPA Claims Arising Between November 2015 And July 2020 Are Viable

09/25/2021 | 08:09am EDT

About a year ago, in Creasy v. Charter Communications, Inc., 2020 WL 5761117 (E.D. La. Sept. 28, 2020), a federal district court in Louisiana held that the TCPA is unconstitutional as applied to any calls made between November 2015 and July 6, 2020. The Creasy  court began with the holding in Barr v. AAPC that the TCPA was void while an unconstitutional provision (the government-backed debt exemption) was part of it. The court then reasoned that the Supreme Court's decision in Barr v. AAPC  cannot be applied retroactively. Ultimately, the court determined that calls made pre-AAPC  were legal and cannot be made illegal by post hac  action of the Supreme CourtCreasy, along with several other district court decisions following the same logic, dealt yet another deadly blow to the TCPA.

On September 9, 2021, however, the Sixth Circuit became the first federal court of appeals to reject Creasy's reasoning. In Lindenbaum v. Realgy, LLC, No. 20-4252, 2021 WL 4097320 (6th Cir. Sept. 9, 2021), the Sixth Circuit ruled that the TCPA can be enforced during November 2015 and July 2020 — the timeframe that the government-backed debt exemption seemingly existed. The Lindenbaum court considered the Chief Judge of the Northern District of Ohio's decision that dismissed a putative class action arising from prerecorded calls. In the trial court, the defendant had moved to dismiss, arguing that "severance can only be applied prospectively," that the applicable statutory sections were unconstitutional when the calls were made, and that courts lack jurisdiction to enforce unconstitutional statutes. In opposition, the plaintiff argued that a footnote in Justice Kavanaugh's plurality opinion in Barr v. AAPC suggests "that severance of the government-debt exception applies retroactively to all currently pending cases." The district court agreed with the defendant and, following Creasy, reasoned that this issue "was not before the Supreme Court," and the lone footnote in Justice Kavanaugh's plurality opinion is "passing Supreme Court dicta of no precedential force." The court reasoned that, while judicial interpretations of laws are "given full retroactive effect in all cases still open on direct review and as to all events," severance is different because it is "a forward-looking judicial fix" rather than a backward-looking judicial "remedy." Thus, it concluded, the effect of severance was to render the statute void during the time the government debt exception was in place and dismissed the claims. The plaintiff appealed.

On appeal, the defendant contended that severability is a remedy that fixes an unconstitutional statute, such that it can only apply prospectively. Alternatively, the defendant argued that if it can be held liable for the period from 2015 to 2020, but government debt collectors who lacked fair notice of the unlawfulness of their actions cannot, then that would recreate the same First Amendment violation the Court recognized in AAPC. The Sixth Circuit rejected both of the defendant's arguments. First, the Sixth Circuit concluded that the Supreme Court recognized the Constitution had automatically displaced the government debt exception from the start, and "then interpreted what the statute has always meant in its absence . . . That legal determination applies retroactively." 2021 WL 4097320 at *4 (citations omitted). Second, the Sixth Circuit explained that the defendant's free speech argument was flawed because fair notice is not tied to speech. Rather, whether a debt collector had fair notice that it faced liability under the TCPA turned on whether it reasonably believed the statute prohibited its conduct. The court noted, "[t]hat, in turn, will likely depend in part on whether the debt collector used robocalls to collect government debt or non-government debt. But applying the speech-neutral fair-notice defense in the speech context does not transform it into a speech restriction."

Plaintiffs will certainly cite the Sixth Circuit's decision in Lindenbaum to overcome the Creasy line of cases. But Creasy's logic isn't defunct yet. It is possible that other circuits will come out the other way, leading to a circuit split and eventually a cert petition.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mr Joshua Briones
Mintz
One Financial Center
Boston
MA 02111
UNITED STATES
Tel: 6175426000
Fax: 6175422241
E-mail: www.mintz.com
URL: www.mintz.com

© Mondaq Ltd, 2021 - Tel. +44 (0)20 8544 8300 - http://www.mondaq.com, source Business Briefing

Stocks mentioned in the article
ChangeLast1st jan.
ACCOR 2.56% 32.01 Real-time Quote.8.14%
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. -0.66% 699.03 Delayed Quote.6.37%
All news about CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
10/14US FTC announces open meeting for next Thursday
RE
10/13NORTH AMERICAN MORNING BRIEFING : Stock Futures -3-
DJ
10/12CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS' : Subsidiaries Close $4 Billion Notes Offering
MT
10/12CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS : Closes $4.0 Billion Senior Secured Notes
PR
10/12CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS : UNDERWRITING AGREEMENT - Form 8-K
PU
10/12CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. /MO/ : Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement, Creation o..
AQ
10/12CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS : Goldman Sachs Adjusts Charter Communications PT to $818 from $866..
MT
10/12CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS : Deutsche Bank Downgrades Charter Communications to Hold From Buy,..
MT
10/11Communications Services Down On Rotation Out Of Growth -- Communications Services Round..
DJ
10/11CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS : Spectrum Mobile™ Introduces Best Deal In Mobile Starting At..
PR
More news
Analyst Recommendations on CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
More recommendations
Financials (USD)
Sales 2021 51 441 M - -
Net income 2021 4 266 M - -
Net Debt 2021 88 813 M - -
P/E ratio 2021 32,8x
Yield 2021 -
Capitalization 128 B 128 B -
EV / Sales 2021 4,22x
EV / Sales 2022 4,10x
Nbr of Employees 96 100
Free-Float 63,5%
Chart CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
Duration : Period :
Charter Communications, Inc. Technical Analysis Chart | CHTR | US16119P1084 | MarketScreener
Technical analysis trends CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
Short TermMid-TermLong Term
TrendsBearishNeutralNeutral
Income Statement Evolution
Consensus
Sell
Buy
Mean consensus OUTPERFORM
Number of Analysts 32
Last Close Price 699,03 $
Average target price 812,68 $
Spread / Average Target 16,3%
EPS Revisions
Managers and Directors
Thomas M. Rutledge Chairman & Chief Executive Officer
John Bickham Vice Chairman, President & Chief Operating Officer
Christopher L. Winfrey Chief Financial Officer
Richard J. DiGeronimo Chief Product & Technology Officer
Stephanie Mitchko-Beale Chief Technology Officer & Executive VP
Sector and Competitors