Log in
Show password
Forgot password ?
Become a member for free
Sign up
Sign up
New member
Sign up for FREE
New customer
Discover our services
Dynamic quotes 
News: Latest News
Latest NewsCompaniesMarketsEconomy & ForexCommoditiesInterest RatesBusiness LeadersFinance Pro.CalendarSectors 
All NewsEconomyCurrencies & ForexEconomic EventsCryptocurrenciesCybersecurityPress Releases

Google defends Android phone maker deals, denies carrot and stick tactics

09/28/2021 | 07:13am EDT
A 3D printed Android mascot Bugdroid is seen in front of a Google logo in this illustration

LUXEMBOURG (Reuters) - Alphabet unit Google on Tuesday said deals with Android phone makers that landed it a record 4.3-billion-euro ($5 billion) antitrust fine boosted competition and rejected EU charges they were a carrot-and-stick tactic that stifled rivals.

Google was addressing the second day of a week-long hearing as it tries to get Europe's second-highest court to annul the fine and a European Commission order to make it loosen its search engine grip on Android devices.

Lawyers for Google and the EU competition executive clashed over the company's Mobile Application Distribution Agreements (MADAs) that require phone makers (OEMs) to pre-install the Google Search app and Chrome browser app in return for licensing Google Play for free.

"This licensing model is what attracted OEMs to the Android platform, and what enabled those OEMs to offer a consistent and high-quality user experience at the lowest possible price," Google's lawyer Alfonso Lamadrid told the General Court.

"People use Google because they choose to, not because they're forced to," he said.

Commission lawyer Carlos Urraca Caviedes rejected the argument, calling the deals and other restrictions Google's carrot-and-stick policy towards phone makers.

"These helped Google ensured its competitors would not achieve critical mass to challenge its dominance," he told the court.

He also said such deals were unnecessary in view of the market power of Google, the world's most popular internet search engine, and its significant number of users.

Urraca Caviedes said what Google did "goes beyond what is necessary to develop and maintain the Android platform".

A verdict may come next year. The case is T-604/18 Google vs European Commission.

($1 = 0.8537 euros)

(Reporting by Foo Yun Chee; editing by Barbara Lewis)

By Foo Yun Chee

ę Reuters 2021
Latest news "Economy & Forex"
03:37aItaly plans to carry out new capital increase at monte dei paschi as market transaction, requiring no burden sharing with investors in bank - source close to the matter
03:36aChina shares rise on boost from environmental protection firms; property falls
03:33aTurkish lira at all-time low 9.85 after Erdogan seeks expulsions
03:33aChina coal futures fall for a fourth day as govt intervenes
03:33aMiners, oil stocks boost UK's FTSE 100; HSBC rises after results
03:31aChina foreign ministry says senior chinese diplomat wang yi to visit qatar oct 25-26 and meet taliban interim government delegation
03:28aNikkei slips on soft earnings, U.S. tech worries
03:26aPanasonic unveils prototype battery for Tesla
03:14aIndonesia sees Q3 GDP growth at 4.3% y/y, warns of future headwinds
03:13aIndian fintech firm Groww valued at $3 bln in new funding round
Latest news "Economy & Forex"