Log in
E-mail
Password
Show password
Remember
Forgot password ?
Become a member for free
Sign up
Sign up
New member
Sign up for FREE
New customer
Discover our services
Settings
Settings
Dynamic quotes 
OFFON

THE CHEMOURS COMPANY

(CC)
  Report
SummaryQuotesChartsNewsRatingsCalendarCompanyFinancialsConsensusRevisions 
SummaryMost relevantAll NewsAnalyst Reco.Other languagesPress ReleasesOfficial PublicationsSector newsMarketScreener Strategies

Chemours : Traversing Obviousness Rejections

10/17/2021 | 10:08pm EST

In Chemours Co. FC LC v. Daikin Industries Ltd. et al., 4 F.4th 1370 (Fed. Cir. 2021) reversed a PTAB decision finding the following claim to be unpatentable as obvious:

1. A partially-crystalline copolymer comprising tetrafluoroethylene, hexafluoropropylene in an amount corresponding to a hexafluoropropylene index (HFPl) of from about 2.8 to 5.3, said copolymer being polymerized and isolated in the absence of added alkali metal salt, having a melt flow rate of within the range of about 30±3 g/10 min, and having no more than about 50 unstable end groups/106 carbon atoms.

The claimed polymers were used to coat wires at high extrusion speeds while producing a high-quality coating. The PTAB found the claim to be obvious from U.S. Patent No. 6,541,588 ("Kaulbach"). Kaulbach taught that polymers with narrow molecular weight distributions performed better than those with broader distributions and that melt flow rates of ≥15 g/10 min are suitable for high- speed wire extrusion. The highest melt flow rate taught was 24g/10 min for sample A11. Kaulbach taught against using known methods for increasing the melt flow rate such as chain transfer agents or high fluorination temperatures because they intrinsically broadened the molecular weight distribution.

In finding the claim obvious the PTAB ignored these teachings:

[E]ven though Kaulbach generically touts that "high processing rates can be achieved" "[d]espite a narrow molecular weight distribution" ([Kaulbach], 3:59-60), this purported discovery would not have prevented the skilled artisan, at the time of the invention of the '609 patent, from considering other techniques—such as broadening the polymer's molecular weight distribution—to achieve higher coating speeds with Sample A11. Based on the evidence presented, we are persuaded that one such technique would have included increasing Sample A11's [melt flow rate] from 24 g/10 min to the recited range of "about 30±3 g/10 min," even if doing so would have required broadening the molecular weight distribution of the polymer beyond the "narrow molecular weight distribution" suggested, but not required or precisely defined, by Kaulbach.

The PTAB's reasoning is not supported by Kaulbach's disclosure or claims, both specifying a molecular weight distribution of less than 2 as determined by the ratio of average molecular weight to number average molecular weight. The Court found that the PTAB's finding of obviousness was not supported by substantial evidence by ignoring the specific teaching regarding molecular weight distribution.

The PTAB's decision is disappointing since it simply adopted the approach of many examiners; apply only the favorable portions of a disclosure and ignore the portions that don't fit the rejection.

In traversing obviousness rejections, it is important to determine if the examiner has provided reasons for the rejection supported by fact and has the examiner ignored portions of the prior art teaching away from the examiner's position.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mr Richard D. Kelly
Oblon, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, L.L.P
1940 Duke Street
Alexandria
VA 22314
UNITED STATES
Tel: 703413 3000
Fax: 703413 2220
E-mail: caskey@oblon.com
URL: www.oblon.com

© Mondaq Ltd, 2021 - Tel. +44 (0)20 8544 8300 - http://www.mondaq.com, source Business Briefing

Stocks mentioned in the article
ChangeLast1st jan.
DAIKIN INDUSTRIES,LTD. 3.60% 25310 End-of-day quote.10.43%
THE CHEMOURS COMPANY -1.91% 29.25 Delayed Quote.17.99%
All news about THE CHEMOURS COMPANY
12/01Chemours Completes $521 Million Sale of Mining Solutions Business to Czech Cyanide Prod..
MT
12/01CHEMOURS : Completes Sale of Mining Solutions Business to Draslovka for $521 Million - For..
PU
12/01Chemours Completes Sale of Mining Solutions Business to Draslovka for $521 Million
PR
12/01CHEMOURS : SECOND AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED RECEIVABLES PURCHASE AGREEMENT - Form ..
PU
12/01CHEMOURS CO : Other Events, Financial Statements and Exhibits (form 8-K)
AQ
12/01NO STRICT LIABILITY FOR IMPROPER SHA : Directors Are "Fully Protected" If They Rely In Goo..
AQ
12/01DRASLOVKA HOLDING A.S. COMPLETED THE : CC) for approximately $520 million.
CI
11/18Making Distributions - No Need To Mind The GAAP
AQ
11/16The Chemours Company Adds Glyclean? D to Its World-Class Glycolic Acid Product Portfoli..
CI
11/10The Chemours Company Begins Production of Opteon? 1150 to Meet Escalating Demand for Lo..
CI
More news
Analyst Recommendations on THE CHEMOURS COMPANY
More recommendations
Financials (USD)
Sales 2021 6 309 M - -
Net income 2021 538 M - -
Net Debt 2021 2 658 M - -
P/E ratio 2021 9,17x
Yield 2021 3,39%
Capitalization 4 767 M 4 767 M -
EV / Sales 2021 1,18x
EV / Sales 2022 1,06x
Nbr of Employees 6 500
Free-Float 84,3%
Chart THE CHEMOURS COMPANY
Duration : Period :
The Chemours Company Technical Analysis Chart | CC | US1638511089 | MarketScreener
Technical analysis trends THE CHEMOURS COMPANY
Short TermMid-TermLong Term
TrendsNeutralNeutralNeutral
Income Statement Evolution
Consensus
Sell
Buy
Mean consensus OUTPERFORM
Number of Analysts 13
Last Close Price 29,25 $
Average target price 41,33 $
Spread / Average Target 41,3%
EPS Revisions
Managers and Directors
Mark E. Newman President, CEO, COO, Director & Senior VP
Sameer Ralhan Chief Financial Officer & Senior Vice President
Mark P. Vergnano Chairman
Randal King VP-Technology & Advanced Performance Materials
Curtis V. Anastasio Independent Director
Sector and Competitors