Log in
E-mail
Password
Show password
Remember
Forgot password ?
Become a member for free
Sign up
Sign up
New member
Sign up for FREE
New customer
Discover our services
Settings
Settings
Dynamic quotes 
OFFON

CHEVRON CORPORATION

(CVX)
  Report
SummaryQuotesChartsNewsRatingsCalendarCompanyFinancialsConsensusRevisions 
SummaryMost relevantAll NewsAnalyst Reco.Other languagesPress ReleasesOfficial PublicationsSector newsMarketScreener Strategies

In race to fill LNG supply gap, project goalposts have changed

11/12/2018 | 02:09am EDT
FILE PHOTO: An LNG tanker passes boats along the coast of Singapore

LONDON (Reuters) - The race is on for liquefied natural gas (LNG) producers to build export terminals as demand soars, but the criteria for financing such mega-projects have shifted as traditional relationships with LNG consumers have begun to disintegrate.

Royal Dutch Shell final investment decision (FID) taken last month for a $30 billion LNG Canada project was a shot in the arm for the LNG industry, which is emerging from almost three years of low prices and investment.

As a vote of confidence in the LNG market, Shell's decision is expected to get the ball rolling on a wave of approvals for dozens of similar projects around the world that have been planned for years but not yet finalized.

But the FID represented a different financing structure, unreliant on commitments from large buyers as previous mega-projects had been, such as the recently commissioned Ichthys facility in Australia or the U.S. Sabine Pass plant.

Instead, Shell will absorb the cost into its budget and will effectively worry about the ultimate buyers later - as one of the largest corporate purchasers of LNG in the world, it can absorb the new volumes into its global portfolio.

Demand for LNG is there - it is expected almost to double to 550 million tonnes a year (mtpa) by 2030, leaving room for plenty more export terminals despite an influx of fresh supply from new, mostly U.S., terminals.

But projects have struggled to find offtakers as the world's biggest buyers in Japan and South Korea seek nimbler terms while others such as India and Pakistan are less creditworthy.

"Projects that require buying commitments are really struggling to find buyers to sign up ... I don't see a lot that is happening," said Vivek Chandra, chief executive of Texas LNG, which plans a medium-sized project of the same name.

"I don't know what the buyers are waiting for because the golden opportunity to sign up for deals was yesterday," he told a conference this month, referring to historically low LNG prices in recent years before they began rising last winter.

Aside from 50 mtpa of supply due from U.S. projects under construction, 17 new U.S. terminals like Texas LNG need FIDs. Other plans dot the world from Qatar's expansion to plants in Russia and Mozambique as well as Southeast Asia.

HEADACHES

Of all these projects, only a handful in the United States will ultimately be built and for others, the ability for the operator to absorb LNG into its portfolio will be key.

"The projects that we might see now are the ones that don't rely on offtake agreements," said Frank Konertz, LNG analyst at S&P Global.

Irrespective of price, long-term offtake commitments are risky today because the global LNG market is undergoing fundamental changes as it grows and increases liquidity.

It needs to solve quandaries such as the pricing mechanism for LNG, traditionally linked to oil, and absorb new technology that shifts the commercial calculations of trading the gas.

"The whole market is in an in-between phase," LNG analyst Emma Richards at Fitch Solutions said. "LNG is becoming more akin to oil with greater spot and liquidity trading referencing benchmarks, but it's a long process and it's creating headaches."

Partly as a result of these uncertainties, and because the market is gaining liquidity, the average duration of offtake deals has halved to less than eight years from almost 20 years in 2010 with volumes per contract falling to 0.75 mtpa from 2.25 mtpa, according to data from Shell's 2018 LNG outlook.

Crucially, about 50 percent of such contracts have no credit rating at all compared to 100 percent in 2010 being A- or B-rated, Shell's outlook showed. Shorter, smaller, less creditworthy contracts make financing multi-billion-dollar projects simply more difficult.

This makes projects by large portfolio players such as Shell, Total and Exxon, which has promised FIDs in Mozambique and Texas next year, easier to finalize.

For U.S. projects, the field is getting tighter - Qatar Petroleum, the world's largest exporter of LNG, said an FID for the Golden Pass project with Exxon was due in the next few months.

Qatar's own huge expansion, expected to get FID next year, would increase capacity to 110 mtpa from current production rates of 77 mtpa.

And some non-U.S. projects have become attractive in light of China's tariffs on U.S. LNG imposed in the midst of a trade war. Canadian projects in particular - there are five planned - will come at a cost to the Gulf Coast plans.

"For a lot of projects looking to sanction now, it's a race against time," Konertz said.

(Reporting by Sabina Zawadzki; Editing by Dale Hudson)

By Sabina Zawadzki


ę Reuters 2018
Stocks mentioned in the article
ChangeLast1st jan.
ALCON INC. -1.28% 77.26 Delayed Quote.33.00%
CHEVRON CORPORATION 2.27% 102.865 Delayed Quote.19.12%
EURO / US DOLLAR (EUR/USD) -0.18% 1.1701 Delayed Quote.-4.06%
EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION 3.21% 59.46 Delayed Quote.39.71%
PIERIDAE ENERGY LIMITED 5.63% 0.375 Delayed Quote.-25.26%
ROYAL DUTCH SHELL PLC 4.82% 18.86 Real-time Quote.23.11%
SEEK LIMITED 1.47% 30.98 End-of-day quote.8.59%
SEMPRA 0.46% 130.38 Delayed Quote.1.85%
THE GLOBAL LTD. 2.62% 235 End-of-day quote.-9.62%
TOTALENERGIES SE 3.44% 41.06 Real-time Quote.12.45%
WOODSIDE PETROLEUM LTD 3.20% 22.88 End-of-day quote.0.62%
All news about CHEVRON CORPORATION
12:59pCHEVRON : Goldman Sachs Adjusts Chevron PT to $112 From $106, Maintains Neutral Rating
MT
09:32aCHEVRON : Thinking about trading options or stock in Costco, Salesforce, Chevron, Facebook..
PR
09/24Oil hits highest in almost 3 years as supply tightens
RE
09/24US Regulator Estimates 16% of Oil Production in Gulf of Mexico Remains Shut In After Hu..
MT
09/23Exclusive-Conoco offers to sell some secondary U.S. oil acreage -document
RE
09/23WALL STREET STOCK EXCHANGE : As smooth as silk
09/23EUROPEAN MIDDAY BRIEFING : European Stocks Rise -2-
DJ
09/23EIA Notes Increases in Oil Producers' Natural Gas Revenue on Higher Prices
MT
09/22Exxon, Chevron conceal payments to some governments -watchdog
RE
09/22Wall Street jumps after Fed policy announcement
RE
More news
Analyst Recommendations on CHEVRON CORPORATION
More recommendations
Financials (USD)
Sales 2021 150 B - -
Net income 2021 12 236 M - -
Net Debt 2021 30 428 M - -
P/E ratio 2021 16,2x
Yield 2021 5,28%
Capitalization 195 B 195 B -
EV / Sales 2021 1,50x
EV / Sales 2022 1,36x
Nbr of Employees 47 736
Free-Float 79,1%
Chart CHEVRON CORPORATION
Duration : Period :
Chevron Corporation Technical Analysis Chart | CVX | US1667641005 | MarketScreener
Technical analysis trends CHEVRON CORPORATION
Short TermMid-TermLong Term
TrendsBullishBearishBullish
Income Statement Evolution
Consensus
Sell
Buy
Mean consensus OUTPERFORM
Number of Analysts 28
Last Close Price 100,60 $
Average target price 122,26 $
Spread / Average Target 21,5%
EPS Revisions
Managers and Directors
Michael K. Wirth Chairman & Chief Executive Officer
Brant Thomas Fish President-Downstream & Chemicals
Pierre R. Breber Chief Financial Officer & Vice President
Eimear Bonner President-Technical Center & Vice President
Ronald D. Sugar Lead Independent Director
Sector and Competitors
1st jan.Capi. (M$)
CHEVRON CORPORATION19.12%194 552
EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION39.71%243 811
RELIANCE INDUSTRIES LTD25.05%213 645
BP PLC25.67%87 624
CHINA PETROLEUM & CHEMICAL CORPORATION10.66%67 095
NESTE OYJ-12.04%46 798